L's profileThe Reluctant PunditBlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    March 31

    readings

    My previous post, while I think germaine, was just venting.  So I decided I'd try to post something more worthwhile, and constructive.
     
    My current reading list includes two very interesting books:
     
    Confessions of an Economic Hit Man - by John Perkins, a self-confessed "economic hit man."  If you've ever wondered where all the US Taxpayer dollars labled "foreign aide" go, when they go to third world countries, or the rather specific directions our international economic policy have been driven, or who's driving them, then you should read this book.  I'm in the opening pages, and I'll tell you, it's quite an eye-opener.  I, for one, had sort of sketched out in my mind some of the things that Perkins essentially documents here - like the fact that the dollars flowing out of the World Bank tend to flow right back into the coffers of Halliburton, Brown and Root, General Electric, and other major American corporations, or how this source of debt basically subjugates much of the third world.  It's far from a "liberal" stand on issues.  It's quite an interesting story, literally the concience-laden stories of a hit man - an economic hit man.
     
    Guns, Germs and Steel: the Fates of Human Societies by Jared Diamond.  Ever wondered why the world is essentially dominated by technology and culture that emerged from the eurasian cultures?  Not what happened starting from 1400 AD, but more like how we got there from 11,000 BC.  Diamond, a biologist with extensive field experience, explores how we got the way we are.  How western culture, forging ahead with steel, aided by guns and germs, essentially overwhelmed almost every other culture on the planet.  It's especially interesting reading during this period, in part due to what's been evolving since 9/11: the clash of an old-world culture with a new-world culture, faciliatated through guns, airplanes, and, possibly, germs.
     
    Finally, I haven't started this one yet, but I intend to:
     
    Our Endangered values: American's Moral Crises, by Jimmy Carter.  Yes, the former president.  To listen to a former Democratic president that seems the quintessential secular liberal ponder the spiritual aspects of morality as they relate to our current socio-political issues - war, growing divide between rich and poor, etc. - should be an eye-opener for anyone that professes to be a Christian.  His arguments should make you consider, or possibly reconsider, some of the rhetoric being espoused by so-called "Religious conservatives," or "Evangelical conservatives."  Carter is, for example, against Abortion on moral and spiritual grounds - but doesn't believe we need to be legislating morality, that it should, in the end, be unnecessary to do so - in a truly moral society.
     
    As for "tough guy fighting," well, from my perspective, it's a sign of our declining civility - if not our declining level of civilization in the United States.  If you've ever read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (not exactly bathroom reading, to be sure), this sort of thing should give you chills.
     
    Happy reading!

    Comments (6)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Picture of Anonymous
    Charlie wrote:

    Hi. I like your website. It is very informative and the pictures are great. Thanks for sharing.
    Best wishes,
    Charlie

    Nov. 15
    Lwrote:
    MSN Spaces frustrations: seems like I've encountered this sort of thing all too often, too.  I'm seriously considering moving off of spaces and to blogspace or some other hosted provider.  Thanks for the effort, and the intentions, anyway.
     
    And thanks for the well-spoken and thoughtful replies.
    Apr. 4
    Picture of Anonymous
    S.W. Anderson wrote:
    FWIW, I was just making my third try (having used  two browsers) to leave a follw-up comment when for no apparent reason I was moved to a previously visited page. Earlier when I tried to leave a comment, this happened and when I returned to this page, Spaces wouldn't recognize my login or accept my comment.
     
    I'm out of time and patience. Maybe some other time.
    Apr. 4
    Seems like some of my better comments always fail to post...  Sigh!  MSN...
     
    Jimmy Carter's comments on legislating morality beg the question.  They also show why he has been a far more effective ex-president than he ever was as president.  He believes that we don't need to legislate morality and it would be unnecesarry in a moral society.
     
    First, we legislate morality all the time.  In fact, nearly all laws are designed to address some sort of moral issue in a given society.  From recreational drug use to embezzlement to murder, we write laws that provide boundaries established by cultural mores.  The only question becomes that of WHO'S morals are the basis for legislation.

    In the United States, most drugs have prohibitions limiting their use to those of a medicinal nature.  In some instances, we can't even agree on that.  Drugs with possible medical uses are further limited due to their nature.  A short journey to Canada places the traveler in a country that allows recreational drug use.  Even so, some restrictions remain.  They have differenct values, and therefore different laws.
     
    Laws designed to provide an equitable and stable playing field in the business world are being used against former leaders of Enron.  They are alleged to have taken unethical and illegal actions for personal gain.  It's a morality issue.  And we have laws that designate what is acceptable.
     
    Even the taking of human life is subject to circumstance.  A person who plans the killing of another and carries through with that plan is considered guilty of first degree murder, a capital crime in many states.  The same person who unintentionally causes the death of another through their actions might be charged with manslaughter.  And someone taking the life of another in self-defense is guilty of no crime.  Someone ending the life of an unborn child is not only safe from criminal charges, they are considered to be acting upon their rights.  The justice of any of the above situations becomes a question of morality.
     
    Jimmy Carter's comments are an attempt to justify a belief most within his faith consider unacceptable.  He claims to be pro-life but refuses to tell another person how they should act.  He refuses to provide guidelines to their actions.  In my book, that's called pro-choice.  If he were truly pro-life, that life would carry more weight than another's choice.  The rights of a murder victim to live far outweigh the murderer's right to choose to kill them.
     
    The most intriguing of these three books is the first.  Yet even "liberals" who decry the actions of "conservatives" (despite Leb's claim it is "far from liberal," the tenet that world poverty is somehow all the United States' fault is indicative of a mindset) sometimes support things that are detrimental to the countries they purport to help.  Consider the impact the Kyoto Protocol would have on developing countries.  Industrialized nations have much to lose if Kyoto were pursued to its end goal.  Undeveloped nations have far more to lose, as they are restricted from the very tools needed for development.  It's a complex situation.
    Apr. 3
    I read Diamond's book when it first came out, truely amazing. Especialy the theorys on why Africa is the way it is today (and has been through history). I might have to reread this one.
    Apr. 2
    Picture of Anonymous
    S.W. Anderson wrote:
    "To listen to a former Democratic president that seems the quintessential secular liberal ponder the spiritual aspects of morality as they relate to our current socio-political issues - war, growing divide between rich and poor, etc. - should be an eye-opener for anyone that professes to be a Christian."
     
    Without intending any incivility, that statement reveals more about what you don't know than it does about what Jimmy Carter or liberals are really like. When he was president, Carter's expressions of faith caused some people to grit their teeth and others to crack wise. He was and always has been very much a Christian gentleman in word and deed.
     
    Carter has put his Christian beliefs to the practical, hands-on work of promoting peaceful resolution of foreign conflicts, overseeing democratic elections abroad and in building homes for the needy.
     
    Carter in some respects is liberal. Secular liberal he is not.
     
    As for his position concerning abortion, which is much like my own, you simply find a logical synthesis of personal values and standards, and beliefs about what's right, fair and practical public policy.
     
    I will add that you also find sensible recognition that no amount of lawmaking and social represession has ever succeeded in eliminating abortion. What those things have done is drive desperate women to seek the services of butchers, sometimes with fatal consequences.
     
    Also, Carter knows that outlawing abortion and demonizing those who seek or have an abortion creates a two-tier system of justice. Women of means who know their way around discreetly go to private clinics or hospitals, or out of the country, where they get an abortion from a qualified doctor. Poor, young, panicked and unsophisticated women end up going to back-alley abortionists, risking their health, life and the possibility of being prosecuted.
     
    Any law that inevitably creates such a two-tier system is simply a mechanism for ensuring injustice.
     
    Christians who believe abortion is wrong can and should teach those values to their young. They can and should support teaching responsible sexual behavior to all young people, along with the safe, sensible use of birth control. They also can help bring about a more sustaining, nuturing and helpful environment in which young women who get pregnant under poor circumstances don't feel abortion is their best or only solution.
    Apr. 1

    Trackbacks (5)

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://reluctantpundit.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D0D1161D07E5DEDC!596.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry